Does Amanpour need Mercy, Grace, or Blocks? The anchor and the news partial view at the table. Coffee? Anyone?

 

Christiane Amanpour is CNN America´s anchor, she did several interviews during years speaking about "human rights", regions devastated by war, people without their rights respected. Maybe the truth is valuable for her only speaking about Syria, and some desertic areas in planets. As virus came, and internet became frentetic, smartphones and lives on fire, influencing people all around the world, people were at the table. Some, at home, for the quarentine. Getting anxious. Others, being watched by tv drones. A joke with persecution and threats allowed by tvs? Depend on which one. If CNN in another country wished to do comments on night gowns of other women, journalists or business women trying to escape from media´s harrasments, maybe, CNN is allowed to do coments, at 5 am, as intrusors in somebody elses daily life, in private houses. But they fell in the right to speak about "Facts First", so let´s get to the facts. The intention of pushing "pressure" and "gossips" as someone is helping Donald Trump to rewrite and review his media´s appearances, keep the balance, and move in favor of black people as George Floyd´s death and the rights demanded to give security for the afro-american, and black people all around the world, with respect by those who cannot use force to do whatever they want, being under the power of mayors, governors, presidents, well, if some media dont want that some people show up and get the spot, are they allowed to use drones for private and tv gossips, persecution ordered by politicians, because some media want to prove the power they have? Amanpour is at the table? Yes. As other journalists that arent CNN US anchor demand the same respect she thinks she owns, the question is: it wasnt a circus around Donald Trump? Why? Cause Trump is a well-suceeded business man, so, let´s make distortions about his figure? He built a separation wall. Yes, it was a mistake. He needed to understand he couldnt do whatever he want to to control the entrance of foreigners in US, and how important are they for the economy, and to keep the country working as it does. So, Amanpour did buil another separation´s wall: Media´s pride. So, she can take people to agree with Trump´s "massive attack", a title as the machine to create sensation would sell, or "He demands for his Rights". Words? Actions. Reactions. So, as CNN allowed that gossips, moral and professional damages, that spreaded in threats in brazilian newspapers to journalists, were shown as the drone´s activities, and one of their tv presentors, was having fun with somebody else privacy and routine at 5 am, trying to escape from tv´s persecutions and tv plus newspapers threats, ordered in agreement of governors, let´s talk again about Amanpour´s "major career" and an Emmy prize, "human rights reports against leaders with devil´s wishes". So, let´s talk about the images in Adelaide with Rafael Nadal, who knew about the threats, for jealously, getting together to CNN America, to show up in Australia, before Australian Open. A pink vision? Which one? For net videos, as he couldnt move from his place? Unless to obey more media´s defense, and to attend his pals games, with sponsored bullying in order to burn someone? Bushfires? How nice. Dogs spreaded? That hit american celebrities, magazines editors, as Federer worked hard to protect his interests in Barilla´s adds? Laughing online? Let´s talk about media´, names, presidents, impeachments, harrasment actions, jokes that are not jokes, and a massive media threatening a journalist with public power. What? Emmy Prize? Women´s rights? Where? Prides´names are hurt? Is she above the law? Backstages? Law for who? Twitter has reacted obeying CNN? Are they controling the power, companies, speaches, and threatening others? Yellow and green are a joke? Poor Jamaica people´s food? What is right? Megan Markle signing on bananas, Federer influencing Prince William and his wife to spread humiliations, showing dogs, and... a funeral? Let´s talk about which pages should be checked? Again? Megan Markle is allowed to use a one year old babe to spread images of "rabbits" and "ducks"? In jokes or to push some burn at somebody elses images? Is she allowed to do that? What was in reverse? Magazines covers? Who is right, who is wrong? Brazilians are the down-level, ignored in rights, those who really do some profitable, their blacks want to show up pushing bullying and agressive reactions, trying to get a spot on tv, and a sportsman, doing videos and pushing hashtags, cannot move? Airports are free? They dont have threats? Which was all that about? Which media´s power? Desires? Free speach? Where? Time to check everything again. Where is the circus going, and what journalism is doing to get money with "Facts Third". Want it at first? Let´s try again. She doesn´t have the right to suggest images that suggest threats, not as a CNN US anchor, not using friends, titles, or names. Black and right in "Law and Order" and equality. Less mobiles, less wifi and backstages, and more "Facts First". Pinneaple is good for health, Vitamin C, immunity. Time to think again. (Rosaly Queen) (Big NY Press) (Fotos Reprodução)